20 Feb 2013

2013 Trend: Smarter Computer Validation

by Fran Nolan


Having been around when dinosaurs roamed the earth and computer validation was “invented,” I am sorry to say that things haven’t changed that much across the industry. Validation of computer systems was originally expected by regulators and subsequently introduced in the manufacturing (cGMP) and lab systems (GLP) arenas. Clinical departments were loath to adopt validation requirements and, to this day, still seem reluctant to accept these requirements.

Over the years, the “validation community” (QA, IT, business functions, etc.) has been very well intended, with many members attempting to promote the ideas that good software development life cycle (SDLC) practices—including documented testing—made good business sense and we shouldn’t look at computer validation as simply a regulatory requirement. Unfortunately, the validation community as a whole generally failed to get this message across; and to this day, many companies, including many software development organizations within those companies, see validation as a necessary evil to be avoided or minimized at all costs.

Those companies, such as Medidata, who have adopted a more enlightened approach to validation have reaped the benefits of more effective and efficient software development practices and most importantly, higher quality software solutions. In particular, great success has been seen in incorporating validation principles within the SDLC process itself, rather than treating validation as a separate exercise. In addition, more modern development and testing practices, such as those based on the agile methodology, result in higher quality solutions, while still generating the necessary documentation expected by regulators.

In 2013, I see even more companies adopting this smarter approach to computer validation and reaping the benefits of a more effective and efficient validation practice.

More on Fran Nolan

Related posts

FDA Wants Your mHealth Clinical Trials

FDA has a message for sponsors that want to incorporate ...

Big News: MOVE-2014 Study Details are Out!

In June we were thrilled to announce the completion of ...

Computer System Validation: Let’s Green Light More Effectively

The time has come for the industry to take a ...

Computer System Validation a Hot Topic at DIA 2012

In March I wrote a blog post previewing the DIA ...

1

Comments in this post

  • Nick Hargaden
    3 years ago

    HI Fran

    I agree that we would all be better off if we can stop seeing validation or SQA as an “FDA thing”, or a “GAMP thing” and challenge ourselves to be the experts in our fields. In fact we should apply that idea to all our activities!

    I’d be interested to hear more on how you are incorporating validation principles within the life cycle. I would also be interested hear how you have found external parties have received agile approaches. My experience is that it still creates some concern and confusion.

    Reply

Leave a reply

1190---1190

August 25 Media Roundup

Here's what you missed in recent ne ...

Connecting Patients to mHealth With ...

Capturing the patient voice in ...

August 15 Media Roundup

Here’s what you missed in recent ...

The Future of Big Data in Healthcar ...

By incorporating genomics data ...

August 8 Media Roundup

Here’s what you missed in recent ...

kendariusKi on TREND 9: EHR-EDC Integration
I enjoy you because of your whole efforts on this site. My daughter takes pleasure in setting aside time for...

Craig on Mining Clinicaltrials.gov for mHealth Data
Hi, guys. Thanks for the great post. I wonder if calling these "Industry Sponsored Mobile Health Trials" is blending a...

Al Covelli on A Three-foot Long Baby… and Other Scary Data Errors in Clinical Trials
Brilliant angle on the benefits of RBM!

Erin on A Three-foot Long Baby… and Other Scary Data Errors in Clinical Trials
Awesome!

Christine Pierre on An Easy Problem to Solve: Speeding Up Payments to Clinical Trial Sites
Speaking for over 2,600 sites SCRS robustly supports this movement! You say sponsors want to keep sites - pay...