2013 Trend: Smarter Computer Validation
Having been around when dinosaurs roamed the earth and computer validation was “invented,” I am sorry to say that things haven’t changed that much across the industry. Validation of computer systems was originally expected by regulators and subsequently introduced in the manufacturing (cGMP) and lab systems (GLP) arenas. Clinical departments were loath to adopt validation requirements and, to this day, still seem reluctant to accept these requirements.
Over the years, the “validation community” (QA, IT, business functions, etc.) has been very well intended, with many members attempting to promote the ideas that good software development life cycle (SDLC) practices—including documented testing—made good business sense and we shouldn’t look at computer validation as simply a regulatory requirement. Unfortunately, the validation community as a whole generally failed to get this message across; and to this day, many companies, including many software development organizations within those companies, see validation as a necessary evil to be avoided or minimized at all costs.
Those companies, such as Medidata, who have adopted a more enlightened approach to validation have reaped the benefits of more effective and efficient software development practices and most importantly, higher quality software solutions. In particular, great success has been seen in incorporating validation principles within the SDLC process itself, rather than treating validation as a separate exercise. In addition, more modern development and testing practices, such as those based on the agile methodology, result in higher quality solutions, while still generating the necessary documentation expected by regulators.
In 2013, I see even more companies adopting this smarter approach to computer validation and reaping the benefits of a more effective and efficient validation practice.
More on Fran Nolan
Comments in this post
Leave a reply
In a risk-based monitoring (RBM) up ...Can a Clinical Data Repository Help ...
http://youtu.be/Kjn7Yo4joFM One ...Q&A: What Is Triggered Monitoring?
http://youtu.be/JojyZqyKFDQ How ...Taking ePRO to New Places
Why in this day and age, with p ...Randomization and Trial Supply Mana ...
I have a keen interest in a particu ...
SCDM: Risk-Based Monitoring and the Implications to Data Management
I absolutely agree with this approach. I think Clinical Data Manager are the one with technical skills and behaviors to...
How Technology and Partnerships are Shaping the Evolving CRO Market (Part 1)
Awesome job guys!!
What a New Proof-of Concept Might Mean for Clinical Trials of the Future (Part 2)
These thoughts on RCT Phase I with continual patient data entry, often without site visits or supervision, may be Ok...
Health Care Innovation Takes Center Stage at Health 2.0
thanks for sharing.. it sounds really good in this article... this providing fund to EHR ..good to see...
Black Hat is Black Gold for Medidata
"With the right tools, a hacker can capture the login credentials of a user and gain “front-door” access to an...
Clinical Data Analytics
Clinical Study Design
Clinical Trial Budgeting
Clinical Trial Management
Clinical Trial Phases
Cloud Computing, SaaS and PaaS
ePRO and mHealth
FDA and Regulatory Affairs
Innovation and Entrepreneurship
Interoperability and eClinical
Randomization and Clinical Trial Supply
Site Engagement and Monitoring
Technology and Agile Development