25 Jan 2012

TREND 1: Addressing Trial Complexity

by Lori Shields

Understanding clinical trial complexity will become more of a focus in 2012 as sponsors seek new ways to manage costs and speed study execution. It’s imperative to understand the impact that a more complex study design has on the success of the trial, particularly on the critical metrics of recruitment and retention of sites and subjects alike. We’ve seen significant growth in the complexity of study design globally, which requires more effort on the part of sites participating, but due to restrained budgets, sites are not always offered competitive reimbursement.

Our data on over 250,000 actual study grants around the world shows us a troubling trend in some US regions. Reimbursement rates for participating sites in the Northeast and Pacific regions have increased, but not enough to offset the high level of work and expertise required by increasing complex studies. Budget-focused sponsors have not appropriately factored in the amount of work that must be performed on a patient, how long it takes, the level of expertise required by the doctors or site staff, as well as the amount of data collected and the required data monitoring. If sites aren’t offered proper compensation for their efforts, sponsors are going to have a hard time recruiting them, putting study timelines at risk.

During study acceptance and the budget negotiation process, a site takes into account many factors and may make a decision to accept what might be considered a lower compensation for a particular study, especially if the drug or device shows promise to their patients. However, in a highly competitive situation, sites will be more apt to work with sponsors who take the complexity of the study design into account with respect to both reimbursement and timelines.

Complexity has a big impact on patient recruitment as well. With social media, patients have access to more and more information about studies available to them. A savvy patient might opt for a study that requires less of their time and fewer onerous procedures, such as blood work for the needle-phobe. I’ve even heard of sponsors getting patient input during the protocol review process—as a way to understand patient tolerance, eliminate unnecessary procedures, predict enrollment and potentially decrease dropout rates. I predict that this particular idea will spread farther in 2012 and I’m eager to see the resulting changes to complex study designs.

More about Lori Shields

Related posts

TREND 3: System Integration to Streamline Trials

The integration of once disparate clinical trial systems will become ...

Medidata Community Gathers to Collaborate, Innovate and Optimize.

As a Medidata customer, I look forward each year to ...

Avoiding the Avoidable in Clinical Trials

Pharmaceutical executives are constantly looking for ways to cut down ...

DNA Synthesis, Clinical IT Integrations and Mickey Mouse-Themed Wedding

I just returned from the Partnerships in Clinical Trials conference ...

0

Comments in this post

  • There are no comments yet. You can be the first to leave a comment.

Leave a reply

274---274

May 24 Media Roundup

Here’s what you missed in recent ...

And The First Medidata Symposium Ha ...

  This year at European Sym ...

May 17 Media Roundup

Here’s what you missed in recent ...

An Inside Look At The World's Large ...

Cancer drug development has shift ...

May 9 Media Roundup

Here’s what you missed in recent ...

kendariusKi on TREND 9: EHR-EDC Integration
I enjoy you because of your whole efforts on this site. My daughter takes pleasure in setting aside time for...

Craig on Mining Clinicaltrials.gov for mHealth Data
Hi, guys. Thanks for the great post. I wonder if calling these "Industry Sponsored Mobile Health Trials" is blending a...

Al Covelli on A Three-foot Long Baby… and Other Scary Data Errors in Clinical Trials
Brilliant angle on the benefits of RBM!

Erin on A Three-foot Long Baby… and Other Scary Data Errors in Clinical Trials
Awesome!

Christine Pierre on An Easy Problem to Solve: Speeding Up Payments to Clinical Trial Sites
Speaking for over 2,600 sites SCRS robustly supports this movement! You say sponsors want to keep sites - pay...